Skip to content

Government · Moraph software

Diplomatic Cable Archive & Search

Find the historical record behind a current issue, and see only what you are cleared to see

Overview

Diplomatic Cable Archive & Search indexes decades of diplomatic reporting so officers can search by meaning as well as by keyword, and find earlier cables, memoranda and reporting on a country, issue or negotiation. Every document carries its classification, caveats and handling markings, and search results are filtered by each user's clearance and need to know before anything is shown. Summaries and suggested related documents cite their sources, and every search and view is recorded for records and security staff.

The problem it solves

Foreign affairs agencies hold decades of cables and reporting that bear directly on current decisions, but much of it is hard to find. Older holdings sit in separate archives with inconsistent metadata, keyword search misses documents that describe the same issue in different words, and officers often rely on colleagues' memory of what was reported before. Access rules make this harder: a search tool that ignores classification, caveats and need to know cannot be used, and one that applies them inconsistently creates risk.

Who it’s for

  • Foreign affairs agencies and their regional and functional bureaus
  • Desk officers, analysts and policy staff who need historical context
  • Records management and historian offices that maintain the archive
  • Information security and classification management staff
  • Inspectors general and oversight staff who review access

How the work flows

  1. IngestCables and related documents are loaded from existing archives with their markings, metadata and dates, and checked before they become searchable.
  2. SearchOfficers search by keyword, by meaning, or by country, post, subject and date. Access rules are applied before results are returned, so documents a user is not entitled to see are not shown or counted.
  3. Review and build contextUsers read documents, follow related reporting, and assemble a reading list or chronology on an issue. Machine-generated summaries are proposals that cite the documents they come from.
  4. Govern accessRecords and security staff manage who can see what, review marking issues, and watch for unusual access, under your agency's policies.

What it does

Meaning-based search
Finds documents that discuss the same issue in different words, alongside exact keyword, phrase and field search.
Access filtering before results
Clearance level, caveats and need-to-know groups are checked for every document before it appears in results, counts or suggestions.
Marking-aware display
Each document and each excerpt is shown with its classification, caveats and handling markings, including portion markings where present.
Marking review queue
Documents with missing, inconsistent or unrecognized markings are held from search until classification staff review them.
Related reporting
From any document, see earlier and later reporting on the same issue, post or subject, filtered by the same access rules.
Cited summaries
Draft summaries of a set of documents, with every statement linked to its source and marked as machine-generated for the user to check.
Chronologies and collections
Build a dated chronology or reading list on an issue, with notes, and share it only with people entitled to every item in it.
Scanned holdings
Older paper and microfilm holdings made searchable through optical character recognition, with lower-confidence text flagged.
Faceted filters
Narrow results by country, post, subject tags, date range, document type and originator.
Declassification history
Declassification, downgrading and release decisions recorded against each document as your authorities make them, with the effect on access applied.
Access monitoring
Searches, views and exports recorded, with reports that surface unusual patterns for security staff to review.
Records retention
Retention and disposition schedules recorded against document series, with holds that prevent deletion while they apply.

Who uses it

Searcher
Searches and reads documents within their clearance and need to know, and builds collections
Archivist
Manages ingestion, metadata and records retention for the holdings
Classification reviewer
Resolves marking issues and records declassification decisions made by your authorities
Access manager
Maintains need-to-know groups and approves access
Security reviewer
Reviews search and access activity for unusual patterns
Auditor (read-only)
Reviews access records and the audit trail without changing anything

Integrations

Source archives
Cables and related documents transferred from your existing archives and records systems, with their metadata and markings.
Personnel security records
Clearance level and caveat eligibility from your authoritative personnel security source, refreshed on a schedule you set.
Single sign-on
Users sign in through your agency identity provider (SAML or OpenID Connect), including PIV-based authentication where your provider supports it.
Records management
Retention schedules and disposition decisions exchanged with your records management system.
Security monitoring
Search, view and export events sent to your security information and event management or insider threat tools.
FOIA and declassification review
Documents selected for FOIA or mandatory declassification review can be exported to your review tools, including Moraph's FOIA redaction engine.
Work API
Metadata, collection and activity data available to authorized internal tools through the Moraph Work API, subject to the same access rules.

Security

US hosting and agency environments
Unclassified and CUI holdings are hosted in the United States region. Classified holdings are deployed in your agency's own environment and operated under your agency's authority.
Cleared support lane
Support tickets from federal clients are handled only by US citizens with active security clearances.
Access checked per document
Clearance, caveats and need to know are checked for every document before it is returned, counted or suggested.
Encryption under controlled keys
Client data is encrypted with keys Moraph staff cannot access without explicit, time-bound authorization.
Complete audit trail
Every search, view, summary, export and access change is recorded with the person and time, and cannot be edited.
AI proposes, people decide
Summaries and suggestions are labeled as machine-generated and cite their sources; they never change markings, access or records.

Hosting and deployment

Moraph cloud, United States
For unclassified and CUI holdings, hosted and operated by Moraph in the United States region.
Dedicated environment
A single-tenant environment for agencies that require isolation, scoped in the proposal.
Agency environment
For classified holdings, the software is deployed in your agency's own accredited environment and operated under your agency's authority, with support from cleared Moraph staff as your procedures allow.

Implementation

Holdings and marking assessment
We review your source archives, metadata and marking conventions with your records and classification staff, and agree how each marking maps to access attributes.
Access model design
Clearance levels, caveats and need-to-know groups are modeled with your security office, and the connection to your personnel security source is set up.
Environment setup
Unclassified and CUI holdings are set up in the Moraph US region. For classified holdings, the software is installed in your agency's environment and operated under your authority.
Staged ingestion
Holdings are loaded in batches, starting with a sample series, and marking issues and extraction quality are reviewed before each batch is released to search.
Access testing
Your security staff test with accounts at different access levels to confirm that results, counts and suggestions respect every rule before go-live.
Training and go-live
Searchers, archivists, reviewers and access managers are trained on their own workflows, including how to check machine-generated summaries against sources.

What it doesn’t do

  • Moraph holds no FedRAMP authorization and no accreditation for classified systems. We map controls and provide documentation to support your agency's own authorization decisions.
  • Classified holdings are not hosted in Moraph's cloud. They are handled only in your agency's environment, under your authority.
  • Access control is only as accurate as the markings on documents and the clearance data from your personnel security source. Documents with missing or inconsistent markings are held until reviewed.
  • It does not classify, declassify or downgrade anything. It records decisions made by your authorized officials.
  • Summaries and suggested related documents are machine-generated and can be incomplete or wrong. Users must check them against the cited sources.
  • Search quality on older scanned holdings depends on scan quality; low-confidence text is flagged and may need rescanning.
  • It is not a cable drafting or transmission system, and it does not replace your official records system of record.
  • Search is in the languages your holdings are indexed for during implementation; translation is not included.

How to evaluate it

  • Index a sample series of your unclassified holdings and compare meaning-based search with your current keyword search
  • Test with accounts at different access levels and confirm that results, counts and suggestions never reveal restricted documents
  • Load documents with deliberately inconsistent markings and confirm they are held for review
  • Ask an officer to build a chronology on a past issue and check the cited summaries against the sources
  • Change a test user's clearance in your personnel source and confirm access changes follow
  • Review the audit trail for a session and confirm it answers your security office's questions

Questions

Can a user tell that a document exists if they are not cleared for it?

Access is checked before results are returned, so documents outside a user's access are not shown, counted in result totals, or suggested as related.

Can it hold classified cables?

Not in Moraph's cloud. For classified holdings the software is deployed in your agency's own accredited environment and operated under your agency's authority. Moraph holds no accreditation for classified systems.

Does the AI decide what is relevant or what can be released?

No. It ranks and suggests documents and drafts summaries with citations. People decide what to rely on, and classification and release decisions are made by your authorized officials.

Where does clearance information come from?

From your authoritative personnel security source, refreshed on a schedule you set. Clearance levels are not typed into the system by hand.

Is it FedRAMP authorized?

No. Moraph holds no FedRAMP authorization for this product. We map controls and provide documentation to support your agency's own authorization decision.

How do we evaluate it before buying?

A demonstration uses fictional documents. For a deeper evaluation, a pilot can index a sample of your unclassified holdings, and your security staff can test access with accounts at different levels.